Wednesday, October 28

Developing the Capabilities to Interact with Science: Session 2

Developing the Capabilities to Interact with Science: Session 2

Maeroa School Aim: To develop 2 big inquiry questions for our 2016 science planning (Term 2 & term 4)

Summary of Workshop
Ø  Recap
Ø  How did the homework go?
Ø  Hands on, minds on
Ø  Assessment
Ø  Pulling it together

Capabilities
·         Gather and interpret data:
o    Observe
o    Infer
o    Think about what they can see
·         Use Evidence
o    Push students to justify
o    Show proof
·         Critique Evidence
o    Explain what you are thinking
o    Understand about fair testing
§  Variables
§  Controls
·         Interpret Representations
·         Engage with Science

Science observation statements – I wonder… It think… What if… I noticed…
Possibly – I infer… I predict… (Depending on context)
Students need to see the links between these sentences (Making connections) – Transfer of knowledge
Students need to put their science lens on to utilise these statements to their full scientific potential.

In the classroom:
Environment boxes – labelled to their location or have them blank – can you guess where I have been?
Jars from different beaches full of sand, shells, rubbish – anything you find

Activity 1: Observing:
-          Fold paper into quarters
-          Observe an item and record down an observation
-          Like scattagories – try and make unique observations – if someone has the same as you cross it off (the downside of this is students miss the obvious observations because they are trying to come up with unusual ones)
-          To avoid this set the challenge of who can make the most observations
-          Make observations that it’s not – “It’s not purple, it’s not round etc…”



Choose specific words – What’s heavy? -  A dragonfly is heavy compared to a grain a sand
Now you decide what you think the objects are – using evidence
Students can start thinking about stories. What has happened here? What has made it like this?
I think… I notice… I wonder….
If students do make an inference say to them “What makes you think this? What are the clues that made you think this?”

This activity helps to:
-          Develop awe and curiosity
-          Deepen thinking
-          Ask questions
-          Engage in discussion
-          Developing oral language/scientific language
-          Put on a science lens
-           

Activity 2, 3 & 4:
-          Blowing bubbles
-          Solar Eclipse glasses
-          Circuit sound maker – Energy stick
-          Kinetic sand
-          Water resistant sand
o    Asking questions “How do you know that’s not normal sand?”
o    Draw what is happening
o    Describe what it is doing
o    How is this happening?
o    Show me your understanding
o    Draw a diagram
-          Water balloon inside a balloon (ARB)
o    Lots of opportunities for wonderings
§  I wonder what different liquids would do
§  I wonder if the temperature would change the flight path
§  I wonder if you prepare it and wait a day if this would change the flight path
“Can you show me the phases of the moon, if the moon was a cube” – This is checking the understanding of phases



Assessment
What’s important?
v  Be clear about the purpose – formative or summative?
v  Make sure it’s manageable
v  Assessment focus needs to be deep enough to track progress over time or you need to change the focus (e.g. generating and critiquing explanations)
My notes:
-          Keep anecdotal notes
-          Is the knowledge/assessment transferable to other context
-          Use the capabilities to form assessments

What counts as evidence?
-          Will you set up specific assessment activities or will you collect evidence as students display it?
-          Will you use formal test?
-          How will you manage the collection of data?



My notes:
-          A critique group used to give effective feedback and feedforward
o    The feedback needs to be specific and constructive
-          If the feedback is specific enough you can break the big task into smaller chunks
-          Student’s need to see the relevance in creating 6 drafts
-          Is what you are asking the students to do fit for a purpose?

What might progress look like?
-          Problematic because progress is unlikely to be linear and context and working in groups are important considerations
-          However if you do want to design some sort of framework we suggest trialling your draft criteria and be prepared to adapt them
Monitoring Sheet for Assessment:
-          Components
-          Attributes
-          Changes
-          Descriptive language
-          Topic specific words
-          Scientific language

Developing children’s capabilities to interact with science
-          Content knowledge
-          A way of knowing
-          Skills



Interests:

Overarching should be the nature of science
-           Planet Earth and Beyond
-          Interacting systems
-          Astronomical systems
-          Life processes
Body systems – improving the performance of an athlete – forces and motion (Olympic link in)
Waves (NZ Coastlines)





No comments:

Post a Comment