Walt - Choose different approaches to scaffold our students in deciding on their option for exploration
Sorting out our options before making our final decision (in regards to initial classic brainstorm)
Why do we need to choose one option?
What do you need to be thinking about when choosing that option?
- Time frame
- Resources
- The option may not answer our PBL scenario and provocative question
We need to:
- Convince a family member or a sponsor that our exploration is important for the future of humans
Number the options
- Sorting the options out in different ways
- Share the processes (work out what works for own classes)
Scenario: The future of humans depends on exploration. You are an explorer contributing to our future. You are to produce a plan for your exploration that convinces your family, class and a sponsor that this exploration is important.
Provocative Question: What do you need to consider to be up to the challenge of planning an exploration that will get sponsorship today?
These topics need a specific research question
Will not let us answer the question:
- How children talk to each other
- Eternal youth
- String tapping
- Frequencies
Will let us answer the question
Bold = The option we selected
- Underground rivers
- Outer-space (possibility of life, food sources, travel)
- Mining and its effect
- Marine Biology (food source)
- Other countries
- Food evolution (how food affects health)
- Medicine (new drugs to replace ones that no longer work, cure for cancer)
- Diets (gluten free, nutrition)
- Maui's travel (exploring local marae/iwi)
- Surviving hostile environments (natural selection, wars and conflict)
- Human evolution
- Antarctica (polar ice caps melting, conservation)
- Ways to help people in need (very broad - needs to be narrowed down - could get sponsorship if it was given a context)
Other ways to narrow down the choices
- Travel versus non travel
- Look at the list of headings from the classic brainstorm and categorise them into the categories they see fit (e.g. - food, music, myths and legends, space, geography, relationships, biology, philosophy and religion)
- Create four questions within the scenario to ask for each of the topics in the classic brainstorm
- Can the topic answer the provocative question?
- Will the exploration help us in the future?
- Is it likely to get sponsorship?
- Is it interesting?
Next Step: Get a generalised idea on the research questions we need to ask to answer the provocative questions
What to include in our report to the sponsors:
- Equipment and resources needed
- Purpose
- The people you want to take with you or work with
- Potential benefits
- The ways to explore and research - e.g. - People (interviews)
- Estimated cost
- Challenges and barriers
- Expected time frame
- Who is your exploration aimed at?
- Presentation method
Put children into pairs and have them decide on an option - must be in pairs first before the decide on an option!
- Scaffold their choices
- Can possibly pre determine the questions
How are you going to present your final product/findings (concluding performance to share their learning) - encourage creativity.
How persuasive is their plan?
- Pamphlet
- Poster
- Skit
- Slideshow
- Documentary Film
- Mock Trial
- Lecture
- Designing a Tool
- Muesum
P3 Groups
Bradley and Ash
Bryce and Hunter
Maya and Tegan
Josh and Shaurye and Michael
Tanner and Kyle and Anthony
Alexa and Estelle and Sacha
Marnie and Casey
Rawinia and Senna
Devon and Matthew
Thomas and Cohen
Ronan and Daniel
Cameron and Cole
Reflection on Process for first two sessions:
Session 1:
- Was very broad and overwhelming to begin with, was unsure of where we were headed and what the final presentation was going to look like
- Classic brainstorm was successful - student's were able to share a lot of ideas (most on topic but some that need to be weeded out using the process above)
Session 2:
- Hugely successful!!
- The decision making process encouraged a lot of discussion and tied in perfectly to our novel study
- Students were able to work in groups and individually through this critical thinking strategy